TY - JOUR
T1 - Update on Omalizumab for Urticaria
T2 - What’s New in the Literature from Mechanisms to Clinic
AU - Larenas-Linnemann, Désirée E.S.
AU - Parisi, Claudio A.S.
AU - Ritchie, Carla
AU - Cardona-Villa, Ricardo
AU - Cherrez-Ojeda, Ivan
AU - Cherrez, Annia
AU - Ensina, Luis Felipe
AU - Garcia, Elizabeth
AU - Medina, Iris V.
AU - Rodríguez-González, Mónica
AU - Caraballo, Jorge Mario Sánchez
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2018, Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.
PY - 2018/5/1
Y1 - 2018/5/1
N2 - Purpose of Review: Since omalizumab has been approved for urticaria, numerous randomized and real-life observational trials have been published. We reviewed the period January 2017–February 2018. Recent Findings: Omalizumab is effective for the control of urticaria recalcitrant to antihistamines in different populations globally. The ratio of total serum IgE 4-week/baseline ≥2 can predict response with a high likelihood. In observational real-life trials, doses have been adjusted on an individual basis: in some populations, up to two-thirds of the patients can be controlled with 150 mg/month; however, others are still not controlled with 300 mg/month. In these, 150 mg bimonthly could be tried, before up-dosing to 450 mg/month. On the long run (up to 3 years) omalizumab kept its efficacy. In many patients, dosing intervals could be augmented (6–8 weeks, some even more). After a 12-month treatment, about 20% showed long-term remission without relapse. Summary: Some biomarkers are being detected. Adjusting omalizumab doses in urticaria patients could enhance efficacy (shortening dosing interval and/or augmenting dose) and save costs (after 12 months: extending dosing interval and/or reducing dose).
AB - Purpose of Review: Since omalizumab has been approved for urticaria, numerous randomized and real-life observational trials have been published. We reviewed the period January 2017–February 2018. Recent Findings: Omalizumab is effective for the control of urticaria recalcitrant to antihistamines in different populations globally. The ratio of total serum IgE 4-week/baseline ≥2 can predict response with a high likelihood. In observational real-life trials, doses have been adjusted on an individual basis: in some populations, up to two-thirds of the patients can be controlled with 150 mg/month; however, others are still not controlled with 300 mg/month. In these, 150 mg bimonthly could be tried, before up-dosing to 450 mg/month. On the long run (up to 3 years) omalizumab kept its efficacy. In many patients, dosing intervals could be augmented (6–8 weeks, some even more). After a 12-month treatment, about 20% showed long-term remission without relapse. Summary: Some biomarkers are being detected. Adjusting omalizumab doses in urticaria patients could enhance efficacy (shortening dosing interval and/or augmenting dose) and save costs (after 12 months: extending dosing interval and/or reducing dose).
KW - Adverse events
KW - Chronic inducible urticaria
KW - Chronic spontaneous urticaria
KW - Dosing intervals
KW - Omalizumab
KW - Pregnancy
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85046825794
U2 - 10.1007/s11882-018-0787-5
DO - 10.1007/s11882-018-0787-5
M3 - Artículo de revisión
C2 - 29744661
AN - SCOPUS:85046825794
SN - 1529-7322
VL - 18
JO - Current Allergy and Asthma Reports
JF - Current Allergy and Asthma Reports
IS - 5
M1 - 33
ER -