TY - JOUR
T1 - The influence of a liner on deep bulk-fill restorations
T2 - Randomized clinical trial
AU - Torres, Carlos Rocha Gomes
AU - Mailart, Mariane Cintra
AU - Rocha, Rafael Santos
AU - Sellan, Pablo Lenin Benitez
AU - Contreras, Sheila Célia Mondragón
AU - Di Nicoló, Rebeca
AU - Borges, Alessandra Bühler
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2020 Elsevier Ltd
PY - 2020/11
Y1 - 2020/11
N2 - Objective: The aim of this study was to evaluate the influence of a liner on the clinical performance of deep posterior restorations performed with bulk-fill composite. Methods: 30 subjects received two restorations on deep preparations in posterior teeth, without pulpal exposure, after selective carious-tissue removal in one-stage. The internal walls reached the inner quarter of dentin, but with a radiographically detectable zone of firm dentin remaining. The pulpal protection using a layer of glass ionomer composite liner (Ionoseal, Voco) was applied in just one preparation. The adhesive system Futurabond U (Voco) was applied in all preparations, which were restored with the bulk-fill pure Ormocer nanohybrid composite (Admira Fusion Xtra - Voco), in up to 4 mm thick increments. All restorations were evaluated using the FDI criteria after 7 days, 6, 12 and 24 months postoperatively. Results: After 24-months, 25 patients attended the recall and 50 restorations were evaluated. The Fisher's statistical analysis (5%) showed no difference between the techniques for the esthetic, functional and biological properties. No postoperative sensitivity was reported for both groups. Conclusion: The application of a liner did not influence the clinical performance of deep restorations with bulk-fill Ormocer composite. Clinical relevance: The application of a liner with a GIC-based material did not have a significant effect on the clinical performance of bulk-fill restorations and seems to be unnecessary for the material tested.
AB - Objective: The aim of this study was to evaluate the influence of a liner on the clinical performance of deep posterior restorations performed with bulk-fill composite. Methods: 30 subjects received two restorations on deep preparations in posterior teeth, without pulpal exposure, after selective carious-tissue removal in one-stage. The internal walls reached the inner quarter of dentin, but with a radiographically detectable zone of firm dentin remaining. The pulpal protection using a layer of glass ionomer composite liner (Ionoseal, Voco) was applied in just one preparation. The adhesive system Futurabond U (Voco) was applied in all preparations, which were restored with the bulk-fill pure Ormocer nanohybrid composite (Admira Fusion Xtra - Voco), in up to 4 mm thick increments. All restorations were evaluated using the FDI criteria after 7 days, 6, 12 and 24 months postoperatively. Results: After 24-months, 25 patients attended the recall and 50 restorations were evaluated. The Fisher's statistical analysis (5%) showed no difference between the techniques for the esthetic, functional and biological properties. No postoperative sensitivity was reported for both groups. Conclusion: The application of a liner did not influence the clinical performance of deep restorations with bulk-fill Ormocer composite. Clinical relevance: The application of a liner with a GIC-based material did not have a significant effect on the clinical performance of bulk-fill restorations and seems to be unnecessary for the material tested.
KW - Bulk-fill
KW - Glass ionomer cement
KW - Liner
KW - Ormocer
KW - Pulp Protection
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85091679996
U2 - 10.1016/j.jdent.2020.103454
DO - 10.1016/j.jdent.2020.103454
M3 - Artículo
C2 - 32835711
AN - SCOPUS:85091679996
SN - 0300-5712
VL - 102
JO - Journal of Dentistry
JF - Journal of Dentistry
M1 - 103454
ER -