TY - JOUR
T1 - Strengths and Challenges of Using iNaturalist in Plant Research with Focus on Data Quality
AU - López-Guillén, Eduard
AU - Herrera, Ileana
AU - Bensid, Badis
AU - Gómez-Bellver, Carlos
AU - Ibáñez, Neus
AU - Jiménez-Mejías, Pedro
AU - Mairal, Mario
AU - Mena-García, Laura
AU - Nualart, Neus
AU - Utjés-Mascó, Mònica
AU - López-Pujol, Jordi
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2024 by the authors.
PY - 2024/1
Y1 - 2024/1
N2 - iNaturalist defines itself as an “online social network of people sharing biodiversity information to help each other learn about nature” and it is likely one of the largest citizen science web portals in the world, as every year millions of observations across thousands of species are gathered and collectively compiled by an engaged community of nearly 3 million users (November 2023). The strengths and potentialities that explain the success of the platform are reviewed and include, among others, its usability and low technical requirements, immediacy, open-access, the possibility of interacting with other users, artificial-intelligence-aided identification, versatility and automatic incorporation of the validated records to GBIF. iNaturalist has, however, features that scientists need to carefully consider when using it for their research, making sure that the quality of observations does not limit or hinder its usefulness in plant research. While these are identified (e.g., the lack of representative photographs for many observations or the relatively frequent identification errors), we provide some suggestions to overcome them and, by doing so, improve the use and add value to iNaturalist for plant research.
AB - iNaturalist defines itself as an “online social network of people sharing biodiversity information to help each other learn about nature” and it is likely one of the largest citizen science web portals in the world, as every year millions of observations across thousands of species are gathered and collectively compiled by an engaged community of nearly 3 million users (November 2023). The strengths and potentialities that explain the success of the platform are reviewed and include, among others, its usability and low technical requirements, immediacy, open-access, the possibility of interacting with other users, artificial-intelligence-aided identification, versatility and automatic incorporation of the validated records to GBIF. iNaturalist has, however, features that scientists need to carefully consider when using it for their research, making sure that the quality of observations does not limit or hinder its usefulness in plant research. While these are identified (e.g., the lack of representative photographs for many observations or the relatively frequent identification errors), we provide some suggestions to overcome them and, by doing so, improve the use and add value to iNaturalist for plant research.
KW - alien plants
KW - citizen science
KW - conservation
KW - monitoring
KW - species discovery
KW - threatened species
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85183090160
U2 - 10.3390/d16010042
DO - 10.3390/d16010042
M3 - Artículo
AN - SCOPUS:85183090160
SN - 1424-2818
VL - 16
JO - Diversity
JF - Diversity
IS - 1
M1 - 42
ER -