TY - JOUR
T1 - Online quality and readability assessment of Early childhood caries information available on websites from distinct countries
T2 - A cross-sectional study
AU - Aguirre, P. E.Ayala
AU - Aníbal, I.
AU - Strieder, A. P.
AU - Lotto, M.
AU - Rizzato, V. Lopes
AU - Cruvinel, A. F.Pereira
AU - Rios, D.
AU - Cruvinel, T.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2022, European Journal of Paediatric Dentistry. All rights reserved.
PY - 2022
Y1 - 2022
N2 - Aim To assess the quality and readability of ECC-related Web information available in English, Spanish, and Brazilian Portuguese language. Methods This study assessed the quality and readability of information related to ECC in three different languages found on the most popular Internet search engines worldwide. Websites were retrieved from different search engines using specific strategies. DISCERN questionnaire, JAMA benchmark criteria, and language-based readability formulas were used by two independent investigators to evaluate the quality and readability of websites. Also, contents were categorised according to aetiology, prevention, and treatment of ECC. The statistical analysis was performed using Spearman’s rank correlation coefficient, hierarchical clustering analysis by Ward’s minimum variance method, and Mann-Whitney U test. P values < 0.05 were considered significant. Results Digital contents of 177 websites were considered of easy readability and low quality, without differences between websites produced by health- or non-health-related authors. Also, websites with ≥ 3 categories of information, or those that recommended dental visits or fluoride toothpastes presented higher DISCERN scores than their counterparts. Conclusion ECC-related digital contents were considered simple, accessible and of poor quality, independently of their language and authorship.
AB - Aim To assess the quality and readability of ECC-related Web information available in English, Spanish, and Brazilian Portuguese language. Methods This study assessed the quality and readability of information related to ECC in three different languages found on the most popular Internet search engines worldwide. Websites were retrieved from different search engines using specific strategies. DISCERN questionnaire, JAMA benchmark criteria, and language-based readability formulas were used by two independent investigators to evaluate the quality and readability of websites. Also, contents were categorised according to aetiology, prevention, and treatment of ECC. The statistical analysis was performed using Spearman’s rank correlation coefficient, hierarchical clustering analysis by Ward’s minimum variance method, and Mann-Whitney U test. P values < 0.05 were considered significant. Results Digital contents of 177 websites were considered of easy readability and low quality, without differences between websites produced by health- or non-health-related authors. Also, websites with ≥ 3 categories of information, or those that recommended dental visits or fluoride toothpastes presented higher DISCERN scores than their counterparts. Conclusion ECC-related digital contents were considered simple, accessible and of poor quality, independently of their language and authorship.
KW - Early childhood caries
KW - Ehealth
KW - Health behaviour
KW - Internet
KW - Prevention
KW - Quality of information
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85125858097
U2 - 10.23804/ejpd.2022.23.01.03
DO - 10.23804/ejpd.2022.23.01.03
M3 - Artículo
C2 - 35274537
AN - SCOPUS:85125858097
SN - 1591-996X
VL - 23
SP - 15
EP - 20
JO - European Journal of Paediatric Dentistry
JF - European Journal of Paediatric Dentistry
IS - 1
ER -